In late October, “Saturday Night Live” spoofed the second presidential debate, in which Democrat Barack Obama and Republican Mitt Romney fielded questions from a town hall audience. One question: “I was wondering what either of you would do to keep dangerous assault weapons such as AK-47s off the street?”
Mock Mitt answered first: “Ah, nothing.” Bogus Barack backed him up: “I would also do nothing.”
The exchange, a condensed take on the candidates’ actual noncommittal responses to a similar question, drew derisive laughter from the SNL crowd. The lack of political will on the issue of gun violence had become, in some people’s eyes, a national joke.
And then a gunman with an assault rifle murdered 26 people, mostly little children, at an elementary school in Connecticut. This atrocity, on top of other recent carnage, including two mass shootings in Wisconsin, is seen as opening the door to new gun laws.
“Timing is everything in politics and I think the timing is ripe right now,” says state Sen. Fred Risser, D-Madison. He favors a state ban on assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition clips, an end to allowing concealed weapons in the state Capitol and other public buildings, and closing the “loophole” that exempts gun shows and private dealers from running background checks.
The man who killed three people and wounded four others at a Brookfield spa in October could not legally buy a gun because his wife, one of his victims, had a domestic abuse restraining order against him. But he avoided a background check by going to a private seller.
A group of Democratic lawmakers has pledged to introduce new state gun controls. State Rep. Leon Young, D-Milwaukee, supports their cause.
“We just can’t continue on the same path,” says Young, a former Milwaukee police officer. “On a weekly basis in my district, people are being shot, people are being killed.”
But the National Rifle Association and other pro-gun groups remain powerful players. The NRA Political Victory Fund, a political action committee, has doled out $939,000 on Wisconsin political campaigns since mid-2008, state records show. This includes independent expenditures of nearly $168,000 in support of Walker, on top of a $10,000 direct contribution.
The NRA and Wisconsin Gun Owners Inc., a state-based group, also spent more than $200,000 on lobbying in 2011 alone.
Walker has declined to back new state bans on weapons or ammunition or tighter gun-sale rules. But he does want the state to consider arming school officials, with appropriate training — a stance similar to that of the NRA, which has called for armed guards at every school in America.
State Sen. Glenn Grothman, R-West Bend, a cosponsor of the state’s concealed carry law, enacted in 2011, doesn’t think the state’s guns laws will change — nor, in his view, should they.
“I think the type of people who introduce this legislation are the type of people who would vote for any anti-gun legislation over the last 10 years,” Grothman says. “They are just using this” — the Connecticut massacre — “as an excuse.”
Grothman argues that the nation’s murder rate has fallen over the past two decades, even though the number of guns has risen. He notes that Connecticut’s tougher gun laws didn’t keep the shooting from happening there, with legally acquired weapons. And he speculates that gun shows account for only “a tiny fraction” of illicit sales.
Jeri Bonavia of Wisconsin Anti-Violence Effort (WAVE), a nonprofit advocacy group, says such attitudes can’t withstand the rising tide of public support for modest and sensible new gun laws: “There is not going to be a tolerance for maintaining the status quo.”
That’s open to debate, but it does seem as though something has changed. When “Saturday Night Live” recently reran its show with the fake town hall debate, the exchange about gun control was edited out.
Bill Lueders is the Money and Politics Project director at the Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism (www.WisconsinWatch.org). The project, a partnership of the Center and MapLight, is supported by the Open Society Institute.
The Center collaborates with Wisconsin Public Radio, Wisconsin Public Television, other news media and the UW-Madison School of Journalism and Mass Communication. All works created, published, posted or disseminated by the Center do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of UW-Madison or any of its affiliates.
The Second Amendment is not about hunting. The "left" will always establish the verbiage, we must resist their attempt to obfuscate this issue. "Live free or die" - never forget.
Lobbyists are getting very good at running our country. Medical lobbyists, NRA, Grover Norquist, Big Bank and Big Oil Lobbyists, Carl Rowe, The Heritage Foundation, etc. Their interests are making money for themselves, not the welfare of those they lobby for or against. No Ones Right supersedes another persons Right. We have regulations to drive our vehicle. It must be deemed safe, licensed and registered. We have food inspectors to make sure what we eat is safe, that our homes contain no asbestos, that paints do not contain lead and our medications do not contain poisons. But yet assault weapons are easier to buy than a pack of cigarettes. Those now out to attack our country are called terrorists. The Second Amendment was when there were muzzle loaders and we needed to defend ourselves from the British. What's next......grenades, missiles and drones? We have an army that protects our country now and the British are not coming. Surely it can not be such a terrible thing to expect people who purchase guns to register them and have a short wait period? And stop with the assault weapons and big magazines. No one shoots a deer 100 times or a tin can 100 times.
As a public school teacher, I don't have a choice. I will be in a union and I will pay union dues. If I don't like what my union is spending its money on, I can just suck it. I have no say in it. The difference is in the more coercive nature of the unions. Some professions, some lines of work, it simply is not optional,. The NRA always is.
We have waiting periods and registrations for law abiding citizens. When will you get it through your head that a criminal doesn't care about waiting periods or registration or big oil or Carl Rove (where did you come up with this?) In case of a terrorist attack, you bet I'd want a RPG or whatever it took to fight on their level of power. But if it were up to you we'd have toothpicks and rubberbands.
The vast majority of shootings can be traced to commission of one on one crime or crimes of passion. These occur predominately in high crime areas, such as the inner cities. For those who aren't residents of these areas, crime can mostly be avoided by avoiding those areas. The vast majority of crime is associated with people of color, but it is usually an act for gain, whether armed robbery or "turf" wars. What can be learned from this; is that white folks are at more risk from other white folks, whether domestic partners, white supremacists, or the mentally ill white male.
What is happening, finally, is a review of the entire Amendment, not just a sentence fragment, and a robust, healthy discussion of what the 2nd Amendment actually means. The Bill of Rights is intended to protect citizens and it will continue to do so as long as our form of government remains.
The following site contains various topics, documents and quotes about Hitlers leftist liberal activism. Contemporary liberal socialists mirror Hitler and the Nazi parties disposition to a 'T' to the point that todays Democrat party can be labeled Neo Nazi's without hesitation. A socialist is a socialist yesterday today and tomorrow. They all share the same dysfunctional psychosis' found in narcissism/elitism. There is no reason to not believe that all guns will be taken from U.S. citizens. http://constitutionalistnc.tripod.com/hitler-leftist/id14.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdOpg8KDkxE
You liberals are true to form. There's just nothing motivating you to learn or grow thus you let government policies you've created give you and tell you all they think you should be happy with and no more. You liberals are THE USEFULL IDIOTS every socialist dictator has called you. Doesn't that insult you at all?
There's no reason to be paranoid when your have control of your gun.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_views_of_Adolf_Hitler The scholars disagree on the personal, private, religious views of Hitler. One thing is common knowledge is the Holocaust was based on Christian principles – not Atheist. It is easy to peg all atrocities to Atheism especially in the -40s as Communism was Atheist. This; however, is not the case. The Nazis were Christian. The Church presided over the Inquisition and guaranteed forgiveness and automatic salvation for every Muslim killed in the Crusades. Christianity has had its fair share of atrocities. Presently, it’s not Atheists preaching hatred and bigotry. It’s Christians in this country. The President is not Atheist. He is Christian. His father was Atheist. He is not. He is Christian.
Militia simply meant armed citizens. Your first mistake was using Wikipedia, as it is not credible.
I see you are back on your "it's the white man's problem" kick again. How do you sleep at night knowing that you are the root of all evil? Or, is it just someone who is a white male that is not you? The vast majority of drive-by's and gang shootings are committed by inner city black males. What are you doing about that? Actually, not a thing. And why? Oh, as a liberal, you'll find some reason why it is the white man's fault. Again how, as a guilt laden white male, do you sleep at night?
nom nom nom
http://www.buzzfeed.com/zekejmiller/chances-of-gun-control-dim-in-washington
I love the smell of Liberty in the morning.