Now that this joke of a recall is behind us, the challenge appears to be uniting the state. Scott Walker has already been expected to heal the rift and bring both political parties to the table. It was the theme of Tom Barrett’s concession speech and Walker himself describe coming together as the next step in moving Wisconsin forward. Yet, are Wisconsin Democrats really ready to come together?
During the recall election, Walker made known that he felt the change in collective bargaining laws could have been handled differently. However, it is important to understand that this does not mean changing the bill, it means getting more information out to the Wisconsin public. Walker understood that in 2010, balancing the budget and loosening the grip of public sector unions was the reason he was elected into power. As we move forward it is important to understand he had the will of people on his side as the GOP brought forth legislation in the first year of his term.
Having won by an even larger margin on June 5th, 2012 than he did in November of 2010, fortifies this stance that the voters of Wisconsin are not in favor of liberal policy that is crippling other states. This also means that moving forward the voters of Wisconsin expect the same fiscally responsible conservative policy enacted as they had already seen from Scott Walker. Therefore, the burden of coming together lies squarely on the shoulders of Democrats in Wisconsin. Are they prepared to accept that Wisconsinites want a strong conservative leader?
Based on the concession speeches given by both Barrett and Mitchell, I don’t believe they want any level of unity. During Barrett’s speech he told his supporters, “Never, ever stop doing what you think is right.” This came after he told the crowd that what they did to get to this election was “right”. He did not tell his supporter to join the governor in his fight to put Wisconsin on the top nationally in jobs, education or quality of life. Instead, he instructed his supporters to continue to challenge the governor as they have. Barrett in losing, wants his supporters to stand against what the people of Wisconsin have said in back-to-back gubernatorial elections.
Mitchell’s speech was much more in your face and aggressive than Barrett’s. As a union representative, what we witnessed from Mitchell was not a sign that he expected things to change. Instead, what we got was the same drum thumping union bullying the people of Wisconsin rejected. Saying things like, “This is a way of life that we always have to keep and that we cannot let up” as he discusses the union activism that drove this failed recall election. He went on to explain to the crowd that this is a “fight we are in and a fight that did not end today whether we won or lost.” Throughout his concession speech he rallied the crowd and encouraged them to stand against the voters of Wisconsin and against the governor. He intentionally took the microphone to divide.
In the end June 5th has proven that the division of this state has been lead by Democrats and their supporters. It has also shown us the path to unity; a path that leads towards a joint effort with Scott Walker to enact pro-business fiscally responsible conservative legislation. This recall election, Walker’s 2010 win, the votes in last years recall elections and the election of the Judge Prosser have all been directly related to Walker’s performance and the direction the state of Wisconsin should be headed. It is clear the voters do not want to see Walker sacrifice his position on current government policy. Rather the people of Wisconsin have said in four consecutive elections that they expect Democrats to join with Walker to fix the divide and bring Wisconsin together. The next two years will show whether the Democrats truly stand with the voters of Wisconsin or if they wish to continue to pander to their union special interest as Mahlon Mitchell is advocating.
There is a proper way to do things, this is usually something that is learned with maturity. What you see in the video is mob mentality. Collectively they are as stupid as the dumbest single digit in the group. It is seeing things like this that pissed me off enough to move farther to the right. I was a Libertarian. Now I am a very conservative Republican, and will likely vote that way for a long, long time. Those hippies motivated people like me like kicking a beehive!
I know you do not agree with me on Social issues, but certainly you understand kicking the beehive?
I'm sure you'd like us to shut up now, and I will. Until a few years down the line when I will be allowed an 'I told you so'.
You have the correct percentages, but what you are missing is that this is the 4th election in 2 years that the Democrats have pumped a huge amount of money and effort into. Each election was seen as a reflection on the work that Walker and GOP were doing in Madison. Not unlike a 4 game series in baseball, it has little to do with how close the games are if you sweep the series.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcuqM1LEi5c The silent majority defines a representative republic (our democracy) as going to the polls. NOT taking over the capitol for months on end, popping on the floors, yelling, banging on drums, disrupting normal business, class tours, entrances, property damage, threatening businesses if they do not put certain signs in their windows, death threats, yelling at political families, protesting at family residences.....
You're right. Its absolutely disgusting what some of the people have done during the insane protests. Its irresponsible. But the pure form of protesting is a wonderful thing. You can't say that all protesters are irresponsible hippies because of a couple irresponsible people doing stupid things. Think back to civil rights movement. People saw the protesters then as disruptive and irresponsible, but they were simply voicing their opinion the only way they could. The protesters at Madison (and I'm talking about the responsible majority of them) were practicing their Constitutional rights and their own civic duty to voice their opinions. You also forget to remember the people who stood in the cold Wisconsin winter asking for signatures to petition for the recall. THAT is democracy in action. I personally think the recall was uncalled for (no pun intended), but I cannot deny that it was a powerful display of democracy and it makes me proud to be American. This post places the responsibility of unification on the Democrats shoulders, but it sure seems like its not JUST the Democrats who divide. Using words like propaganda, chimpanzees, and hippies certainly does not help to unite. Who in their right minds would want to agree with people like that?
1) The people that were against Walker. (Most of Barrett's votes) 2) The people people that were for Barrett. (Barrett and his wife) 3) The people that were for Walker and the reforms. (The vast majority) 4) The people that were against the recall. (unknown, but present) A quick look at this list (item 2) shows that Barrett would have probably done better if he had attempted to present a platform, but then again, probably not.
You seem to be an intelligent, respectful person. You may find that those who have different opinions than you will treat you with respect because of that. Lyle Ruble is one of those people who have earned respect from those on the right- well, most of them. There are always a few loonie tunes out there. You are correct about name calling; I have done my fair share of that. What you haven't witnessed is the endless insults we endured the whole time this recall was in process. Some posters have been harassed at their homes. I witnessed the peaceful protesters living in the Capital making a mess- that seems disrespectful to me. I protest with my vote, I may even protest with letters. But I do not disrupt the process to hurt everyone who depends on it. We had the ultimate show of democracy in action- an election. Let's hope we don't have to go through that again anytime soon.
Many of us are inspired. The folks in WI did the right thing, indeed. It has been noticed. Long Live the Republic.
The time and location will be disclosed here on Patch, that is of course if Schmitzy mans up and honors his wager...
Thank you for your thoughts.
Keep up the good fight!
Walker dropped the BOMB on SS Obama. Call the coast guard Donald
6:47 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012 What's you address. I'll mail you the check.◄ omgomgomg http://menomoneefalls.patch.com/articles/how-did-gov-scott-walker-survive-the-recall
As to the meaning of Walker's win (or avoidance of being recalled, rather), it's important to note the significant level of anti-recall votes. Walker got the vote of 17% of stated Obama supporters. It's highly unlikely that these voters were expressing their pleasure in Walker's right-wing agenda. They were voting because they believed the recall process was illegitimate. Republicans can take this as some sort of mandate to run even further to the right if they wish. In fact, I really hope they do. Putting the real agenda on display is the quickest and surest way to return the state to sanity.
The real agenda has already been put on display - it's called fiscal responsibility, demanding efficiency from government, returning power to the local level, and limiting the size of government. What part don't you understand exactly? And that's what people voted for - the message! You honestly want us to believe that people who adamantly stand opposed to Walker's agenda and believe that he represents the worst thing in American politics today went out to the polls and voted for him anyway in some kind of symbolic vote and/or stand against recalls?!?! The koolaid in liberal land must be getting stronger instead of weaker! You may want to layoff your constant exposure to MSNBC and the Daily Kos - it's having adverse effects on your ability to reason and think for yourself.
Both sides are beholden to their special interests. Both sides are simple political gamesmen - some of them have a set of values that they actually believe in. Both sides, of course, feel they are right. It is not going to get more quiet. It will get louder. More money. More "digging in". In the end - no one really wins except the local radio and tv stations.