.
Feedback

47% Wins, the United States Loses

Buying an election with entitlements.

Elections come and go with only minor effects on the American public.  We have seen our fair share of depressions, recession and booms.  All the while, the America that drove the last century of global development and innovation continued to thrive.  It was driven by individual aspirations and a government that encouraged success through the Constitutional development of non-intervention. 

This election will be different.  It is not the end of America and it will not be seen as the beginning of the end.  In truth, that beginning has been at work since our founding.  This election signals the first time the citizens of the United States accepted the terms of the end.  It has taken 223 years to degrade our Constitution and now it is recognizable only as a loose set of ideals from a time gone by. 

No country on this planet in which the citizens use the government as an intermediary between takers and producers has survived.  Prior to 2012, it was this denial to do so in the United States that separated our existence from that of our failing counterparts in Europe.  With the acceptance that the government should become heavily involved in the interactions of takers and producers, we will no longer be a country that spreads success throughout the world.  Instead, we have entered the perpetually declining existence of a country controlled by those that don’t sacrifice for it; yet, expect their fellow citizens to sacrifice for them. 

Government dependency is the opiate for the masses.  It instills hope in its promise of a better life through faith in its leaders.  Providing your daily sustenance in easy to consume and easy to desire forms.  Building passion through the ideology of distrust and demanding discipleship in the voting booth based on the fear of opiate removal.

This dependency can no longer be stopped, but rather like any drug its use will gradually get worse.  As current forms of dependency fail to meet the wants if the 47%, they will demand a leader that promises higher dosages of dependency and buck all those intent on restraining the use of dependency.  A point will be reached, around the same time of the full implementation of Obamacare, when dependency will be established as the new norm and our country will discontinue private production of certain services that were vital to our previous existence as individuals. 

What the 47% fails to understand is that we only have a finite amount of money.  You can only rob a set number of people and you can only sell a one or two internal organs before the money needed to sustain the addiction runs dry.  Having already borrowed $6 trillion to produce a net result of zero growth in four years; how much borrowing is required to produce growth?  Assuming that government spending to produce growth is possible, we will have created a debt that consumes interest at a rate that makes repayment impossible and sustainability of current services improbable. 

In the end, the American existence that once created the ability for success will die.  As more money is required to fill the wants of the takers, the income level of the producers will continue to decrease.  The government will continue as it has; increasing regulations, increasing restrictions and decreasing service in order to fill the gap between the amount they can take from the producers and the amount required by the takers.  An unemployment rate of 8% or above will be ordinary and mediocrity rather then success will be the United States we pass on to the next generation.  The United States, once a powerful world leader, protector and supporter that could be relied on for assistance, will become neutered by its own people for the sake of their own desires. 

We had a chance to correct the errors of government dependence and rather then taking responsibility for our current situation we chose the selfish need for instant gratification.   Most devastating result of this election is that we will only be able to tell our children of American Exceptionalism and not show them how to attain it.  We have arrived at the time that progressives have dreamed about since the signing of the Constitution; a heavy handed central government and the development of the system of elections in which votes could be purchased through the manipulation of government entitlements. 

The 47% now owns this portion of American history.  The days of blaming Bush are gone.  They have accepted our demise based on their own wants.  Lust of success is what started this push hundreds of years ago and it is that same lust which drives our own decline.

CowDung November 9, 2012 at 04:28 pm
Croc:
Do you really think that Chrysler is going to choose to pay their taxes at the higher US rate when they can save money by paying taxes to China instead? They are going to follow the lead of every other multinational company and pay their taxes where it is most financially advantageous.
Lex Parsimoniae November 9, 2012 at 04:32 pm
Quite frankly, I've lost my faith in the majority of the American Populace. At least one of the founding fathers had an accurate "big picture idea":
"When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic" - Benjamin Franklin
James R Hoffa November 9, 2012 at 04:44 pm
@Taoist the Inept -
Point 1: Chrysler currently exports Jeeps to China. Exporting product creates American jobs. Mitt Romney claimed that by expanding production facilities in China, we'd lose American jobs. You said that was a lie. Clearly, it wasn't unless you're claiming that domestic demand will all of sudden exponentially increase to make up for the loss in demand of product needed for export. And if that's the case, then please provide your source or admit that Romney wasn't lying after all. Point 2: The need to manufacture in China to be competitive in China derives from China's unfair trade policies, currency manipulation, and lax (by comparison) labor, environmental, regulatory, and taxation standards. Romney said he'd take on China to make trade more balanced and fair, which would be beneficial to our industrial/manufacturing workforce. Obama, by contrast, hasn't done very much except to prosecute complaints with the WTO - which hasn't changed very much! China needs our marketplace for their goods more than we need to consume their cheaply produced goods. Romney wanted to get tough on China, while Obama cowers, fearful of what a 'trade war' may do. Those are the points you half-wit!
James R Hoffa November 9, 2012 at 04:48 pm
@CowDung -
That's what the left does when they know they've been beaten by the great Hoffa - clearly the superior intellect!
J. B. Schmidt November 9, 2012 at 05:00 pm
@Taoist
Based on your illogical train of thought, wouldn't all companies that export then be free to move all production of those exports over seas? Is that the solution you favor? In essence what you want it a country that only manufactures for the needs of its people and nothing more. Please explain then how we ever achieve a reasonable level of employment when you have now artificially capped production? Especially considering that we have millions of people in the US employed making exports, where do those jobs go in your world?
Taoist Crocodile November 9, 2012 at 05:57 pm
JB,
You really are a babe in the woods. Firms ARE free to produce and sell wherever they can. That's not the "solution I favor," that's reality. If you were at all committed to, or conversant in, free market principles, I wouldn't have to explain this to you. The US needs to take the problem of its competitive advantage seriously, there's no question about that. And what is our competitive advantage vs. China? Why, it's primarily the rule of law! The fact that we have regulations that ensure that US made products are safe, and that intellectual property is protected! You know, all that "government" stuff that you hate so much! And seriously - if you had any credibility on this issue, you'd be insisting that the US government, the one purchaser that SHOULD be buying according to US national interest, sources ALL of its purchases in the USA. But no; conservatives would rather privatize everything, and put our tax dollars in the hands of buyers that have no responsibility to buy American made products. Let's just wrap it up by pointing out that my business is in manufacturing, and we source items from all over North America, Asia, and Europe. You and Hoffa can spout off about how it's wrong and bad for America for Chrysler to make and sell cars in China, but it's clear to me, and to anyone else who makes their living this way, that you have no idea what you're talking about.
J. B. Schmidt November 9, 2012 at 06:33 pm
@Croc
If you had stated from the beginning that you suffered ADD, we probably would have approached this from a different direction. Seriously, could you focus for a minute. Are you saying that Jeep is moving it production over seas because they feel constrained by US laws on safety and intellectual property rights? Is it in the governments best interest to purchase a product at an inflated price in order to buy American? Are you saying that the government should be doing more to subsidize private sector jobs? At what cost to the tax payer? Or is that irrelevant? "Privatize everything", are we still talking about auto companies? What if the government lowered taxes by cutting subsidies out of the federal budget, then US manufacturers could produce a product at lower cost and make it a better purchase for the government. It appears that you are in favor of companies taking their jobs over seas.
Taoist Crocodile November 9, 2012 at 06:52 pm
Hey, I came here wanting to make a point about how, in 2009, 16% of capital gains went to the Forbes 400. For some reason, that doesn't bother any of you, and you want to defend Mitt Romney's desperate, dishonest, last-minute, and thoroughly debunked attempt to scare Ohio voters. And I'm the one with ADD?
Never mind, you guys have fun licking your wounds and doubling down on the idiocy that led to Tuesday's result. I'll just kick back and bask in the fact that all of the bitching, moaning, mudslinging and doomsaying you tried over the last 4 years had NO EFFECT! The history lesson that covers the Tea Party will be short and sweet: "Angry white people, working themselves up and wasting their own time while the rest of the world passed them by."
James R Hoffa November 9, 2012 at 06:54 pm
@Taoist Jackhole -
"JB, that's a fair question, since there were so many. However, I'm referring to the implication that building Jeeps in Asia, for Asian markets, the same way foreign car companies build cars in the US, for the US market, is somehow "shipping jobs overseas." Just let me know if you still don't understand, and then pay me $100/hr, and I'll explain that aspect of international business to you." As Hoffa demonstrated to you via Marchionne's comment, Jeep currently exports US produced/assembled product to China for sale there. Thus, some of the demand that is driving the domestic Jeep factories is vested in providing exports to China. Are you claiming that if Jeep started producing all Chinese market Jeeps in China, instead of here as they currently are to a certain extent, that it wouldn't constitute "shipping jobs overseas," by lowering the demand placed on the US factories? In fact, that's exactly what it would do and you basically admit to this. The debate here isn't what's in the best interest of globally competitive business - it's over the allegation that you made about Romney supposedly lying. Hoffa proved that Romney was not lying, and you appear to agree with this. So, just admit that you were WRONG in accusing Romney of lying about Jeep and get on with living your life with your head up your rectum, such as it is.
Randy1949 November 9, 2012 at 07:01 pm
@JRH --Not lying? I distinctly heard Mitt Romney telling a crowd that "all" Jeep production was moving to China. He didn't say "all production of Jeeps intended for the Chinese market." You are quick to accuse other folks of lying, merely for saying something you don't believe to be true. Don't you consider Mr. Romney's remarks to have been the least bit misleading?
James R Hoffa November 9, 2012 at 07:10 pm
@Randy1949 -
What do you think about the Obama campaign claiming that Romney was personally responsible for the death/murder of Joe Soptic's wife? Was that a factually accurate portrayal, or might it "have been the least bit misleading?" It's up to the voter to investigate for themselves and decide on the shade's of gray. Personally, Hoffa feels that Romney's over generalizations were far more fair than those made by Obama during this election! Also, we were working within the confines of Taoist's original statement: "I'm referring to the implication that building Jeeps in Asia, for Asian markets, the same way foreign car companies build cars in the US, for the US market, is somehow "shipping jobs overseas."" And clearly, Jeep upping production in China would in fact be "shipping jobs overseas," right? Or do you have proof that domestic demand will instantaneously exponentially increase, completely alleviating the loss of demand for product for export to China? And if you do, then how come you and your crystal ball aren't making millions in the business sector?
Randy1949 November 9, 2012 at 07:16 pm
Were those words out of Barack Obama's own mouth? I don't know, because I never did see any of those political ads.
The word 'all' came directly out of Romney's lips. You can't get around that.
morninmist November 9, 2012 at 08:49 pm
I sure heard a lot of this oversampling of Dems this last month here on Patch.
Also read the PPP and Daily Kos tied for most accurate polls this election cycle. http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2012/11/romney-adviser-not-single-person-campaign-thought-he-would-lose?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Motherjones%2Fmojoblog+%28MotherJones.com+|+MoJoBlog%29 Romney Adviser: Not a Single Person on the Campaign Thought He Would Lose —By Dana Liebelson | Thu Nov. 8, 2012 2:45 PM PST Romney advisers are telling CBS News that there wasn't one person on the Romney campaign who saw the loss coming, and the GOP presidential candidate was "shellshocked" by the results. Here's what they have to say: "We went into the evening confident we had a good path to victory...I don't think there was one person who saw this coming." "There's nothing worse than when you think you're going to win, and you don't...It was like a sucker punch." Romney "was shellshocked." The CBS story indicates that the Romney team even bought into the "unskewed polls" theory, believing that the polls dramatically underestimated Republican turnout and overestimated Democratic enthusiasm. ...
J. B. Schmidt November 9, 2012 at 09:08 pm
@Croc
I would like you read the following Bloomberg article. Pay close attention to the following quote, “should we be localizing the entire Jeep portfolio or some of the Jeep portfolio.” http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-21/fiat-says-china-may-build-all-jeep-models-as-suv-demand-climbs.html As for an Ranieir quote to the opposite, he can only speak for Jeep. Fiat can still move Jeep production where ever it wants. Mike Manley, as quoted, represents Fiat.
Taoist Crocodile November 9, 2012 at 09:17 pm
JB, I don't think you're reading that article correctly. They're talking about adding capacity in China, not moving capacity from the US to China. The "portfolio" refers to all Jeep models, which will now be produced in China in addition to being produced elsewhere. The article doesn't support your position at all.
J. B. Schmidt November 9, 2012 at 09:47 pm
@Croc
You are seeing what you want.
Taoist Crocodile November 9, 2012 at 10:26 pm
JB, the article that you linked to says this:
"Chrysler currently builds all Jeep SUV models at plants in Michigan, Illinois and Ohio. Manley referred to adding Jeep production sites rather than shifting output from North America to China." Are you telling me that that sentence says something other than what it says?
Adam Wienieski November 10, 2012 at 02:50 pm
"If you want to continue living and working here you might as well start accepting the new reality of a much more diverse America." – Lyle Ruble
Conformity for diversity's sake? That's not a remarkable statement coming from an old apparatchik like Lyle but it demonstrates how Leftism always leads to tyranny. First, an individual liberty (e.g. homosexual sex) is deemed so personal the government rightly has nothing to say about it. Then having identified a group of victims in need of protection and approval the high priests of political correctness demand the persecuted minority is celebrated as equal in all things. Finally, diversity and tolerance are coerced by government fiat in the name of progressive public policy and its detractors silenced and condemned. The fascist and Orwellian policy of compulsory conformity in the name of diversity must be resisted with the first two tools provided by the constitution: the first and second amendments. Freedom from government is the canary in the coalmine of liberty.
Kenneth London November 10, 2012 at 03:05 pm
Yes chalk up a victory to partisan redistricting.
Kenneth London November 10, 2012 at 03:13 pm
This notion that we see over and over on Fox News and hear over and over on Charlie Sykes that those who voted for Obama are looking for more handouts is ridiculous and insulting. Its funny how those who disagree with your outlook and your ideas get to tell you WHY you voted. This election I think shows a return to "common sense". The American people did not buy the idea that we could lower everyone's taxes another 20% and begin to address the national debt. They did not trust candidates who said they would make drastic cuts to programs but not tell us which ones or that they would get rid of tax shelters and deductions without telling us which ones. Now - let's start to address the budget, the debt, and the economy in a way that Americans have said they want - a fair, balanced approach. Modest revenue increases and modest spending cuts.
Bob McBride November 10, 2012 at 03:24 pm
But that's not what they said, Kenneth. They said they want more of what we've had over the past 4 years. Nothing has changed. The balance of power has remained unchanged, the same people are in the key positions. Americans have said they the logjam to continue.
Kenneth London November 10, 2012 at 03:28 pm
Also - as to the business community and the best way to deal with the debt problem try this little tidbit that came out just before the election: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/group-major-ceos-urges-tax-184317732.html
I always find the best people to ask about how to improve the corporate condition is the people WHO RUN CORPORATIONS.
morninmist November 11, 2012 at 04:30 pm
wow! I actually agree with BK. wow!
@bigatlantasteve Bill Kristol on Fox News Sunday: 'You know what? It won't kill the country if we raise taxes a little bit on millionaires. It really won't.
Dirk Gutzmiller November 12, 2012 at 01:06 am
Hoffa - Of course that is what you would say about your own "brilliance". My opinion is you are very good at hopeless cases, but the lawyer gets paid anyway. Even Republicans are ashamed of Bush and Cheney, why were they not speakers at the Rep. Conv.? huh, huh, huh? It is so very ludicruous in this day and age to be a Bush lover.
Dirk Gutzmiller November 12, 2012 at 01:19 am
McBride - Just because you find a link or two on the wide open Internet does not win your point. You need to get off of Patch being another of your computer games and get some genuine humanity.
Did you notice those billboards coming down in minority neighborhoods that inimidated voters? Did you notice the news coverage on letters to voters questioning their right to vote? True American patriots accomplished the defeat of those tactics, and the Tea Party slinked back into their primitive hole. The word had gotten to the Tea Party poll watchers not to cause turmoil. It was becoming a P.R. disaster for the Tea Party, getting the minority vote to get out and vote, and the Tea Party cooled it with the shouting and intimidation. Victory over suppression, thanks for your suppression efforts, it paid off for the other team.
Dirk Gutzmiller November 12, 2012 at 01:36 am
Hoffa - Your snide insinuation that Obama hates white people reflects on your lashing out having lost so badly in spite of your great efforts to get Obama defeated. Maybe the future scene you painted was so sparse, so dismal, so mean.
Obama is not white, not black. Perfect for moving all of us moving ahead. Or are you just going on skin color? Lamentable.
Dirk Gutzmiller November 12, 2012 at 01:39 am
I have not idea what you are talking about Jim, but the new agenda is to work together to help our Nation. Are you in?
Dirk Gutzmiller November 12, 2012 at 01:42 am
@Hoffa - You argue rather poorly, than claim victory. The Great Depression, The Great Repression, the Great Hoffa! Superlatives can work both ways.
Dirk Gutzmiller November 12, 2012 at 01:47 am
Has anyone noticed that Hoffa manages to pull in others when he is ln trouble in a thread? Easy enough to have several screennames. Just takes a minute or two.
Bob McBride November 12, 2012 at 02:20 am
Dirk,
Either you've got something to back up your nonsense, or you don't. Don't carp about the methodology. It's accepted and routinely used here. So cutting through all the crap, Dirk, essentially what you're saying is you've got nothing. Figures.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Greendale Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Mark Maley (Editor) June 8, 2013 at 05:59 pm
Welcome to Greendale! We're glad to see that you're part of our community. Patch readers can findRead More out more about this new business in a profile that will be published next week.
David Cotey (Editor) June 9, 2013 at 11:04 am
We actually did a story on Friday! :)Read More http://greendale.patch.com/groups/business-news/p/florist-opening-second-location-in-downtown-greendale
Steve ® June 6, 2013 at 12:38 am
LOL teachers doing anything in the summer. Full time pay for part time work and you think they willRead More use this without a union mandate!
Walker celebrates after defeating the liberal unionista blue fisters
Jason Patzfahl June 5, 2013 at 12:23 pm
We can look up to see who signed a recall of their elected official because of grievances, but weRead More cannot look up who donated large wads of ca$h to the same official's campaign...Thank you GOP for turning that window of open accountability into a one-way mirror with the GOP looking out and everyone else stuck looking inward, wandering why we don't get the same vantage point. A bit hypocritical don't you think? And BTW, your GOP budget just ticked off every principal, superintendent and public school family in the state of WI today. Good luck on that second term of negative growth (-0.74).
Steve ® June 5, 2013 at 12:38 pm
Jason- See the IRS for list of donors to pro republican groups. They were illegally collected andRead More distributed. You signed the recall, no one made you do it. Deal with it already and stop changing the subject to interject some off the wall non comparison. ~in solidarity
Bren June 14, 2013 at 08:20 am
I think Scott Walker's record speaks for itself in terms of state job growth and misplacedRead More priorities. "Blue fisters" didn't create Scott Walker, he's been a creature of ALEC since the early 1990s. Let's see if he decides to do a Bachmann in 2014. A lot of people who didn't vote in the recall election because they didn't understand/agree may not have voted for him in 2010. Anyone who has a 20-something college grad who can't find a job, male spouse, family member or friend in their 50s who can't find a job, was cut from needed health care benefits, etc., is bound to be looking for better leadership.