patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

State Board Needs More Than 60 Days to Verify Recall Signatures

The Government Accountability Board also needs $100,000 in software upgrades, an off-site facility and temp workers.

 

Wisconsin recall elections seem like a pretty sure thing, and to be sure the integrity of the process is preserved, the Government Accountability Board is asking for an extension to review petition signatures.

State statute gives the agency 30 days to conduct a review, but the GAB is asking for 60 days or more, according to an Associated Press story.

Government Accountability Board Director Kevin Kennedy said the court-ordered, more stringent process is driving the timeline. Completing the verifications in 60 days plus a primary for the gubernatorial race means a May election. Further court challenges or other delays could mean pushing the election(s) to June or later.

While 540,000 signatures are required to spark a recall election, state Democrats say they expect to turn in 1.5 million signatures. Originally, the GAB said it was up to the Walker campaign to challenge signatures, but a Waukesha County judge said that process is up to the Accountability Board.

On Jan. 6, Rep. Robin Vos (R-Rochester) released figures he'd requested for how much the recall election(s) could cost the state. Without a primary, state residents have a $9 million price tag, $17 million with a primary. In Racine County, State Sen. Van Wanggaard's potential recall election adds another $100,000 to $200,000 to that total.

Related Topics: Government Accountability Board, Governor Scott Walker, Robin Vos, State Sen. Van Wanggaard, and Wisconsin Recalls

mau

7:48 pm on Thursday, January 12, 2012

What will be interesting is how many signatures actually match the name on the recall sheet and if they are readable.

How will the voters in the future be able to sign a recall petition if the schools don't think writing (which includes reading) cursive is necessary.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Randy1949

3:54 pm on Friday, January 13, 2012

We were actually discussing that on New Years Eve with my family, now that some schools have decided not to teach cursive writing at all. My step-granddaughter signs her name by printing, always has. I guess it's a sign of the times.

However -- how legible is your signature on a check or credit card authorization? I know that mine has grown a little more florid as the years have passed. It doesn't mean it isn't genuine.

Comment_arrow

mau

4:23 pm on Friday, January 13, 2012

My husband prints his signature. When he has written it, it is impossible to read. His print is very unique. It's like a combination of both. When I learned cursive it was almost like an art form. With arthritis I have lost that ability to write all but small amounts. I always make sure that my signature is legible. At times I forget and start out fluidly and end up a line. My capital letters are always the same. So anyone comparing my signatures would automatically see that they are the same signature.

I do research and it requires me to read written entries, sometimes in other languages. Over time one gets used to the writing and are able to recognize the individuals way of writing or printing the alphabet.

I was transcribing practice recall sheet and it was obvious to me that two of the signatures were written by the same individual.

I am curious if this software that the GAB wants to use will be programmed to recognize the handwriting or just fake names and/or duplicate names.

Craig

8:02 pm on Thursday, January 12, 2012

I find it rather odd that when it was Walker's job to verify the signatures he would only have 30 days to do so. Now that the burden of verification is on the GAB (rightfully so), there is a request for an extension.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve

9:06 pm on Thursday, January 12, 2012

I find this entire process rather odd. Just another thing for Walker to fix after the recall nonsense is over with. Which will cost us tens of millions, I thought libs wanted more money to go to the children? Why do they hate children?

Comment_arrow

Say What?

9:36 pm on Thursday, January 12, 2012

They smell bad. There, I said it.

The Anti-Alinsky

8:53 pm on Thursday, January 12, 2012

When was it's Scott Walker's job to verify any recall signatures?

Reply

Randy1949

9:04 pm on Thursday, January 12, 2012

Before he filed a lawsuit. http://www.fox6now.com/news/witi-20111219-walker-recall-lawsuit,0,5792661.story Previously, the burden of proof was on the person subject to the recall.

Reply

Bob McBride

10:23 pm on Thursday, January 12, 2012

No amount of time and/or money is too much to spend to attempt to correct the situation when Democrats don't get their way.

Reply

Bren

11:33 pm on Thursday, January 12, 2012

This situation is largely unprecedented. The GAB is prudent to request sufficient time to do its work. As I've said before, I'm an independent who is glad my tax dollars can help pay for the recall effort. I'd rather pay for this than to finance a pay boost for a Walker crony moving into an outsourced public worker's job at a higher salary rate.

Or pay for the Big Business tax cuts--oh wait, the public workers already did that.
Or pay for Mrs. Walker to order public employees around like serfs (if the rumours are true)
Or pay for Republican officials to dabble in high school sex ed curriculum during a Jobs session.
Or pay for more tax breaks for GP/Koch so they can lay off some more workers.

Etc.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve

12:11 am on Friday, January 13, 2012

"I'm an independent" - lololollololo that made my night

Comment_arrow

Bob McBride

6:16 am on Friday, January 13, 2012

"This situation is largely unprecedented."

*****************

Gee, yah think?

It's largely unprecedented, highly unnecessary and as Steve noted your credentials as an "independent" are laughable. You are the prototypical "useful idiot".

Comment_arrow

Ben Hogan

1:29 pm on Friday, January 13, 2012

Bren@ Why doesnt Walker get more time to also verify the signatures? GAB says it now needs more than 60 days but the Walker campaign is given 2 weeks.

Comment_arrow

Ben Hogan

1:31 pm on Friday, January 13, 2012

Prior to this ruling the GAB was not going to do anything to verify the signatures other than look at an address. Why did it take a court ruling to force them to do their job?

Comment_arrow

Bob McBride

1:33 pm on Friday, January 13, 2012

Be patient, Ben. Bren doesn't pull these answers out of his own noggin. He'll have to rush back over to Kos to ask someone there how he's supposed to respond to your query.

Comment_arrow

Ben Hogan

1:50 pm on Friday, January 13, 2012

Sorry Bob i forgot, somehow this is the Koch's fault.

Comment_arrow

C. Sanders

2:01 pm on Friday, January 13, 2012

You're an independent? I couldn't tell, you hide it so well.
hahahahahahahahahaha

Comment_arrow

Bren

9:19 pm on Saturday, January 14, 2012

Steve, yes I'm an independent. The current hard right-wing radicalism also seems to be turning my Goldwater-Republican dad into a moderate too, which I enjoy teasing him about.

Bob McBride, epithets are the first defense of the inarticulate. Write like an adult and I will discourse with you.

Ben, I can't answer your question without looking into the rules which I haven't had time to do this week. I'm sorry. But I'll restate my original point--we should take the time to do this right. I think the world is watching.

Comment_arrow

Bob McBride

10:53 pm on Saturday, January 14, 2012

Bren, I have no interest in "discourse" with you. You're just fun to poke at with a stick now and then.

Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

1:56 pm on Sunday, January 15, 2012

@Bren -

"Or pay for Mrs. Walker to order public employees around like serfs (if the rumours (sic) are true)"

Now, you're basing your so-called 'facts' on mere ‘rumours’ (sic)! And yet you have the audacity to continue to call yourself an 'independent.'

Give it up already Bren! Anyone with any brains at all that have followed your posts is able to realize that you're nothing more than a Daily Kos, Rachel Maddow, Ed Schultz promoting leftist.

Also, if you haven't done so already, I'd like to invite you to check out my first film review as a part of a new feature that I started, Hoffa's Retro Cinema Club, over on the Mount Pleasant-Sturtevant and Caledonia Patches.

http://mountpleasant.patch.com/blog_posts/hoffas-retro-cinema-club-among-giants-1998

Thanks,
--JRH

Craig

7:39 am on Friday, January 13, 2012

People like Bren need to hope that Walker doesn't survive the recall. They know he balances budgets, and next year there will be a $10-20 million cost to be paid for. Hopefully on the backs of the public unions....Scott- make them pay 25% of thier premiums to pay for this debacle!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Leslie Lauersdorf-Adam

3:26 pm on Friday, January 13, 2012

This country was founded on religious and political freedom. Why do Walker supporters feel their opinion is the only one that counts? Since when do Walker supporters feel they can be verbally demeaning, threaten people with physical harm, spit on them and attempt to destroy the signatures already obtained? If this is the mentality of his supporters, I can understand why they support Walker. He used the tactics of a thug pushing his will upon people without following protocol. Scott in case you had not been paying attention, state employees now are paying twice for their insurance. I'm sure from your comments, in your mind this is fair.

Comment_arrow

CowDung

3:33 pm on Friday, January 13, 2012

Open your eyes Leslie. There are bad actors on both sides, or have you forgotten all the death threats that some in the anti-Walker crowd were making?

Can you please explain what you mean when you say that state employees are paying twice for their insurance, and why you think it is so unfair?

Comment_arrow

Sam Vedder

3:36 pm on Friday, January 13, 2012

Leslie... Where in any of the comments here, do you see that anyone is being spit on, threatened, or has anyone said only their opinion matters?
Please also explain how state employees are paying twice for their insurance.
After all the documented "thug" tactics displayed by the unions, you have a lot of nerve trying to paint Governor Walker as a thug.

Comment_arrow

Bob McBride

4:15 pm on Friday, January 13, 2012

(Sam and CD, I think Leslie was "venting" - she's probably moved on to her quiet place now with the Windham Hill Sampler playing softly in the background...possibly a hint of sandalwood wafting through the air...please respect her right to purge the angst.)

Comment_arrow

CowDung

4:45 pm on Friday, January 13, 2012

That's a bit disappointing. It sounded like someone was actually bringing up a talking point that hasn't been discussed around here yet...

Comment_arrow

Bob McBride

4:50 pm on Friday, January 13, 2012

CD, I'm guessing she actually meant pension versus insurance - or just misunderstood that particular shopworn talking point. If not, perhaps she'll return and clarify after achieving a more restful, positive state of mind.

Comment_arrow

Bren

9:38 pm on Saturday, January 14, 2012

Craig-"People like Bren need to hope that Walker doesn't survive the recall."

Once again, the public union concessions didn't address the budget shortfall. They funded the new corporate tax cuts which means it was a financial "wash." That's no victory.

And your point about Walker balancing budgets--this is something that really anyone can do. It takes creativity and vision to be able to analyze how a business (which our state is not) or nonprofit can maintain its core activities without significant change in quality. That's an investment for the longterm because one doesn't want to jeopardize the "business" one already has. It costs a lot more to develop new clients than to maintain the existing base. Would you agree with that idea?

The issue I have with Scott Walker in this area is that he runs through the process with a club when a scalpel is needed. There's no consistency and little thought. Ex.: As County Executive he tried to fire the lady who has designed the beautiful and popular shows at the Domes for years. You wouldn't believe how little pay she received, especially when you consider that people come to the Domes to see those shows and they bring such joy.

Firing public employees and not replacing them causes delays and inefficiencies that slow down business and daily life. Firing employees and replacing them with higher paid crony appointments is fiscally unsound.

That's partly why I support the recall effort.

Comment_arrow

Leslie Lauersdorf-Adam

10:01 pm on Saturday, January 14, 2012

Yes, state employees are paying twice or 100% for their insurance. In case some of you have forgotten, they pay state taxes also in addition to paying their monthly premiums. As I read the comments below, I still am seeing a lot of demeaning remarks only because someone has a different opinion. Again, thug tactics. If you consider the tactics used by Walker were okay, just remember he can (and in all probability will) use them on benefits you or your family should receive. Then don't come and tell the rest of us about his policies and the practices he used to get there. Please note I've not demeaned anyone in this reply. Merely stated what I know for sure. If you care to respond, please try to keep it at an adult level not that of a thug.

Comment_arrow

Bob McBride

11:12 pm on Saturday, January 14, 2012

CD, there's Leslie's talking point. Apparently since public employees are also paying state income taxes, that means their paying twice, or 100% of their insurance.

I don't even know where you start with something like that.

Comment_arrow

CowDung

8:30 am on Monday, January 16, 2012

It must be that 'new' math they are teaching these days, Bob.

Leslie:

I'm not sure how bumping up the contribution levels to 12.5% (what you are calling 'paying twice') brings the percentage up to '100%'. What percentage of a public employee's health insurance am I (along with thousands of other private sector taxpayers) paying?

Mr.Ed

7:44 am on Friday, January 13, 2012

I'm just glad verification is needed. Otherwise Donald Duck will try to overturn any election in which he didn't get what he wanted. How many signatures are needed to force a recall election on pres obummer?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Randy1949

2:11 pm on Friday, January 13, 2012

An infinite number, since the federal government has no recall provision. A US President may be impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors.

Comment_arrow

Bob McBride

2:45 pm on Friday, January 13, 2012

For once the Feds got it right. If we can trust the entire country to criteria such as that, surely the state of WI would be safe with those same criteria - particularly in light of how our current loosey-goosey ones are being abused by the sore losers.

Comment_arrow

Mr.Ed

1:29 pm on Saturday, January 14, 2012

I knew that Randy, but I was pondering the popular vote seems to sometimes be quite different that the electoral vote actual outcome of presidential elections. Another subject.
So is this the new trend? The next time a democrat makes it in are we going to do a recall election again?

Comment_arrow

Randy1949

1:36 pm on Saturday, January 14, 2012

@MustangSally -- that is because of the winner take all nature of the electoral college. Some US Presidents actually lose the popular vote or win by a very slim margin and feel they have a mandate because of the electoral count.

That is why Wisconsin will be such an important state in the upcoming election. We're purple, and the vote could go either way, depending on a lot of factors.

Comment_arrow

Mr.Ed

1:46 pm on Saturday, January 14, 2012

Good point Randy. I'm proud of our purple this time around.
It seems like so many (liberals) have this love affair with the political climate of the 60's being a time of "action". True! But aren't the times we are living in now an incredible time of similar action? (you wouldn't know it by the nightly news)

Comment_arrow

Keith Schmitz

2:32 pm on Saturday, January 14, 2012

There are plenty of Democrats you could go after right now. But the baggers don't have the ambition or the organization.

Robert W Farkas

7:59 am on Friday, January 13, 2012

It is up to you to make a choice here and now. You can either be part of the solution or part of the problem. Do nothing constructive, just vent at some forum or blog, OR sign up at http://www.facebook.com/VerifyTheRecall.
Thousands of people will be working to verify the legitimacy of the signatures on the recall petitions. I have already downloaded and tested the process. It is straight forward, simple and easy. Even I can do it.
All work will be double checked and all volunteers will be vetted. You as a good citizen can make a real difference.
Now that the recaller crowd has littered the field with waste and hate you can either sit on the sidelines and yell at or about the players or you can contribute to the solution.
Unlike the recall effort ... "I want a do over!!" this will cost Taxpayers nothing.

Reply
Comment_arrow

mau

2:46 pm on Friday, January 13, 2012

I'm doing both. Plus I'm waiting to get approved and trained, so I can work at the polls this year.

Comment_arrow

Keith Schmitz

3:00 pm on Saturday, January 14, 2012

Hate? Union thugs? Yeah, you guys are so much not about hate.

Keith Schmitz

3:07 pm on Saturday, January 14, 2012

Bob, hate to tell you that you'll have to take time away from incessant posting on Patch to be a part of that.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob McBride

10:57 pm on Saturday, January 14, 2012

Once again, I appreciate your concern for my time, Keith, but it really doesn't require a lot of time or effort to counter the best efforts of someone like yourself.

Leave a comment